Hi Jianfeng, Thanks for the email. rte mempool was successfully created without any error. Now the next problem is that rte_eth_rx_burst() is always returning 0 as if there was no packet to receive... Do you have any suggestion on what might be causing this issue? In the meantime, I will be digging through ixgbe driver code to see what's going on.
Thank you, Younghwan 2015-11-25 ?? 3:19? Tan, Jianfeng ?(?) ? ?: > Hi Younghwan > When you specify --no-huge, by default, only 64M memory is used. Can you use > -m 1024 to > Mmap 1G memory to have a try? > > Jianfeng > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Younghwan Go >> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 1:46 PM >> To: dev at dpdk.org >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] no hugepage with UIO poll-mode driver >> >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to create rte mempool with my own memory scheme (shared >> virtual memory between CPU & GPU) other than using hugepage. I'm using >> IGB UIO module with Ethernet 10G 2P X520 Adapter NIC. >> >> I first tried to disable hugepage by inserting "--no-huge" option, but it >> gave >> an error at rte_mempool_create function. Then I found in rte_eal.h file that >> said "no-huge mode cannot be used with UIO poll-mode drivers like >> igb/ixgbe". >> >> Is there a way to switch DPDK code to not use hugepage with ixgbe driver or >> is it not possible to do so? >> >> Thank you, >> Younghwan
