> From: David Marchand [mailto:david.march...@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 14 June 2023 09.14 > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 8:57 AM Yang, Qiming <qiming.y...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, Tyler > > May I know why you need to change the legacy atomics? rte_atomic32_xxx > series action is performance optimized, I don't think the change is needed as > no bug or other requirement. > > The deprecation of rte_atomic32_xxx atomics is not a new topic.
It would be nice if the roadmap web page mentioned that the legacy rte_atomicXX API is being phased out in favor of C11 atomics, and other long term directions for DPDK. > > Performance impact is not a problem for control path code, is it? > > > -- > David Marchand
