Hi Cheng,
My replies are inline.
Thanks,
Amit Shukla
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.ji...@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2023 10:21 AM
> To: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitpraka...@marvell.com>;
> tho...@monjalon.net; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richard...@intel.com>;
> m...@smartsharesystems.com; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo....@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Hu, Jiayu <jiayu...@intel.com>; Ding, Xuan
> <xuan.d...@intel.com>; Ma, WenwuX <wenwux...@intel.com>; Wang,
> YuanX <yuanx.w...@intel.com>; He, Xingguang <xingguang...@intel.com>;
> Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jer...@marvell.com>; Anoob Joseph
> <ano...@marvell.com>
> Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH v5] app/dma-perf: introduce dma-perf application
>
> Hi,
>
> Replies are inline.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jiang, Cheng1
> > Sent: Monday, June 12, 2023 4:27 PM
> > To: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitpraka...@marvell.com>;
> > tho...@monjalon.net; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richard...@intel.com>;
> > m...@smartsharesystems.com; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo....@intel.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Hu, Jiayu <jiayu...@intel.com>; Ding, Xuan
> > <xuan.d...@intel.com>; Ma, WenwuX <wenwux...@intel.com>; Wang,
> YuanX
> > <yuanx.w...@intel.com>; He, Xingguang <xingguang...@intel.com>;
> Jerin
> > Jacob Kollanukkaran <jer...@marvell.com>; Anoob Joseph
> > <ano...@marvell.com>
> > Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH v5] app/dma-perf: introduce dma-perf
> > application
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for your comments, replies are inline.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cheng
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitpraka...@marvell.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, June 9, 2023 10:03 PM
> > > To: Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.ji...@intel.com>; tho...@monjalon.net;
> > > Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richard...@intel.com>;
> > > m...@smartsharesystems.com; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo....@intel.com>
> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Hu, Jiayu <jiayu...@intel.com>; Ding, Xuan
> > > <xuan.d...@intel.com>; Ma, WenwuX <wenwux...@intel.com>; Wang,
> > YuanX
> > > <yuanx.w...@intel.com>; He, Xingguang <xingguang...@intel.com>;
> > > Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jer...@marvell.com>; Anoob Joseph
> > > <ano...@marvell.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH v5] app/dma-perf: introduce dma-perf
> > > application
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Cheng Jiang <cheng1.ji...@intel.com>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2023 2:14 PM
> > > > To: tho...@monjalon.net; bruce.richard...@intel.com;
> > > > m...@smartsharesystems.com; chenbo....@intel.com
> > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; jiayu...@intel.com; xuan.d...@intel.com;
> > > > wenwux...@intel.com; yuanx.w...@intel.com;
> > xingguang...@intel.com;
> > > > Cheng Jiang <cheng1.ji...@intel.com>
> > > > Subject: [EXT] [PATCH v5] app/dma-perf: introduce dma-perf
> > > > application
> > > >
> > > > External Email
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --
> > > > -- There are many high-performance DMA devices supported in DPDK
> > > > now,
> > > and
> > > > these DMA devices can also be integrated into other modules of
> > > > DPDK as accelerators, such as Vhost. Before integrating DMA into
> > > > applications, developers need to know the performance of these DMA
> > > > devices in various scenarios and the performance of CPUs in the
> > > > same scenario, such as different buffer lengths. Only in this way
> > > > can we know the target performance of the application accelerated
> > > > by using them. This patch introduces a high-performance testing
> > > > tool, which supports comparing the performance of CPU and DMA in
> > > > different scenarios automatically with a pre- set config file.
> > > > Memory Copy performance test
> > > are supported for now.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Cheng Jiang <cheng1.ji...@intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jiayu Hu <jiayu...@intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yuan Wang <yuanx.w...@intel.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Chenbo Xia <chenbo....@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > v5:
> > > > fixed some LONG_LINE warnings;
> > > > v4:
> > > > fixed inaccuracy of the memory footprint display;
> > > > v3:
> > > > fixed some typos;
> > > > v2:
> > > > added lcore/dmadev designation;
> > > > added error case process;
> > > > removed worker_threads parameter from config.ini;
> > > > improved the logs;
> > > > improved config file;
> > > >
> > > > app/meson.build | 1 +
> > > > app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c | 472
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > app/test-dma-perf/config.ini | 59 ++++
> > > > app/test-dma-perf/main.c | 569
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > app/test-dma-perf/main.h | 69 +++++
> > > > app/test-dma-perf/meson.build | 17 +
> > > > 6 files changed, 1187 insertions(+) create mode 100644
> > > > app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c create mode
> > > 100644
> > > > app/test-dma-perf/config.ini create mode 100644 app/test-dma-
> > > > perf/main.c create mode 100644 app/test-dma-perf/main.h create
> > > > mode
> > > > 100644 app/test-dma-perf/meson.build
> > > >
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +static inline int
> > > > +do_dma_mem_copy(void *p)
> > > > +{
> > > > + uint16_t *para_idx = (uint16_t *)p;
> > > > + volatile struct lcore_params *para = worker_params[*para_idx];
> > > > + volatile struct worker_info *worker_info = &(para->worker_info);
> > > > + uint16_t dev_id = para->dev_id;
> > > > + uint32_t nr_buf = para->nr_buf;
> > > > + uint16_t kick_batch = para->kick_batch;
> > > > + uint32_t buf_size = para->buf_size;
> > > > + struct rte_mbuf **srcs = para->srcs;
> > > > + struct rte_mbuf **dsts = para->dsts;
> > > > + int64_t async_cnt = 0;
> > > > + int nr_cpl = 0;
> > > > + uint32_t i;
> > > > + uint32_t poll_cnt = 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + worker_info->stop_flag = false;
> > > > + worker_info->ready_flag = true;
> > > > +
> > > > + while (!worker_info->start_flag)
> > > > + ;
> > > > +
> > > > + while (1) {
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < nr_buf; i++) {
> > > > + if (unlikely(rte_dma_copy(dev_id,
> > > > + 0,
> > > > +
> > > > rte_pktmbuf_iova(srcs[i]),
> > > > +
> > > > rte_pktmbuf_iova(dsts[i]),
> > > > + buf_size,
> > > > + 0) < 0)) {
> > > > + rte_dma_submit(dev_id, 0);
> > > > + while (rte_dma_burst_capacity(dev_id,
> > > > 0) ==
> > > > 0) {
> > > > + nr_cpl =
> > > > rte_dma_completed(dev_id,
> > > > 0, MAX_DMA_CPL_NB,
> > > > + NULL,
> > > > NULL);
> > > > + async_cnt -= nr_cpl;
> > > > + worker_info->total_cpl +=
> > > > nr_cpl;
> > > > + }
> > > > + if (rte_dma_copy(dev_id,
> > > > + 0,
> > > > +
> > > > rte_pktmbuf_iova(srcs[i]),
> > > > +
> > > > rte_pktmbuf_iova(dsts[i]),
> > > > + buf_size,
> > > > + 0) < 0) {
> > > > + printf("enqueue fail again at
> > > > %u\n",
> > > > i);
> > > > + printf("space:%d\n",
> > > > rte_dma_burst_capacity(dev_id, 0));
> > > > + rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "DMA
> > > > enqueue failed\n");
> > >
> > > [Amit]: On all success or failure exits, please call rte_dma_stop
> > > and rte_dma_close to exit cleanly.
> >
> > [Cheng] Got it. Thanks, I'll fix it in the next version.
>
> [Cheng] Hi, I take a look into it, and find out rte_exit() will call
> rte_dma_close(), so I think there is no need to do it explicitly here. What do
> you think?
[Amit]: I agree, not required to explicitly call rte_dma_close here.
>
> >
> > >
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > + async_cnt++;
> > > > +
> > > > + if ((async_cnt % kick_batch) == 0) {
> > > > + rte_dma_submit(dev_id, 0);
> > > > + /* add a poll to avoid ring full */
> > > > + nr_cpl = rte_dma_completed(dev_id, 0,
> > > > MAX_DMA_CPL_NB, NULL, NULL);
> > > > + async_cnt -= nr_cpl;
> > > > + worker_info->total_cpl += nr_cpl;
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (worker_info->stop_flag)
> > > > + break;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + rte_dma_submit(dev_id, 0);
> > > > + while ((async_cnt > 0) && (poll_cnt++ < POLL_MAX)) {
> > > > + nr_cpl = rte_dma_completed(dev_id, 0,
> > > > MAX_DMA_CPL_NB, NULL, NULL);
> > > > + async_cnt -= nr_cpl;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +void
> > > > +mem_copy_benchmark(struct test_configure *cfg, bool is_dma) {
> > > > + uint16_t i;
> > > > + uint32_t offset;
> > > > + unsigned int lcore_id = 0;
> > > > + struct rte_mbuf **srcs = NULL, **dsts = NULL;
> > > > + struct lcore_dma_map_t *ldm = &cfg->lcore_dma_map;
> > > > + unsigned int buf_size = cfg->buf_size.cur;
> > > > + uint16_t kick_batch = cfg->kick_batch.cur;
> > > > + uint32_t nr_buf = cfg->nr_buf = (cfg->mem_size.cur * 1024 *
> > > > +1024) /
> > > > (cfg->buf_size.cur * 2);
> > > > + uint16_t nb_workers = ldm->cnt;
> > > > + uint16_t test_secs = cfg->test_secs;
> > > > + float memory;
> > > > + uint32_t avg_cycles = 0;
> > > > + float mops;
> > > > + float bandwidth;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (setup_memory_env(cfg, &srcs, &dsts) < 0)
> > > > + goto out;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (is_dma)
> > > > + if (config_dmadevs(cfg) < 0)
> > > > + goto out;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (cfg->cache_flush) {
> > > > + cache_flush_buf(srcs, buf_size, nr_buf);
> > > > + cache_flush_buf(dsts, buf_size, nr_buf);
> > > > + rte_mb();
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + printf("Start testing....\n");
> > > > +
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < nb_workers; i++) {
> > > > + lcore_id = ldm->lcores[i];
> > > > + offset = nr_buf / nb_workers * i;
> > > > +
> > > > + worker_params[i] = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(struct
> > > > lcore_params), 0);
> > > > + if (!worker_params[i]) {
> > > > + printf("lcore parameters malloc failure for
> > > > lcore
> > > > %d\n", lcore_id);
> > > > + break;
> > > > + }
> > > > + if (is_dma) {
> > > > + worker_params[i]->dma_name = ldm-
> > > > >dma_names[i];
> > > > + worker_params[i]->dev_id = ldm->dma_ids[i];
> > > > + worker_params[i]->kick_batch = kick_batch;
> > > > + }
> > > > + worker_params[i]->worker_id = i;
> > > > + worker_params[i]->nr_buf = (uint32_t)(nr_buf /
> > > > nb_workers);
> > > > + worker_params[i]->buf_size = buf_size;
> > > > + worker_params[i]->test_secs = test_secs;
> > > > + worker_params[i]->srcs = srcs + offset;
> > > > + worker_params[i]->dsts = dsts + offset;
> > > > + worker_params[i]->scenario_id = cfg->scenario_id;
> > > > + worker_params[i]->lcore_id = lcore_id;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (is_dma)
> > > > + rte_eal_remote_launch(do_dma_mem_copy, (void
> > > > *)(&i), lcore_id);
> > > > + else
> > > > + rte_eal_remote_launch(do_cpu_mem_copy, (void
> > > > *)(&i), lcore_id);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + while (1) {
> > > > + bool ready = true;
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < nb_workers; i++) {
> > > > + if (worker_params[i]->worker_info.ready_flag ==
> > > > false) {
> > > > + ready = 0;
> > > > + break;
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > + if (ready)
> > > > + break;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < nb_workers; i++)
> > > > + worker_params[i]->worker_info.start_flag = true;
> > > > +
> > > > + usleep(TEST_WAIT_U_SECOND);
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < nb_workers; i++)
> > > > + worker_params[i]->worker_info.test_cpl =
> > > > +worker_params[i]->worker_info.total_cpl;
> > > > +
> > > > + usleep(test_secs * 1000 * 1000);
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < nb_workers; i++)
> > > > + worker_params[i]->worker_info.test_cpl =
> > > > worker_params[i]->worker_info.total_cpl -
> > > > + worker_params[i]-
> > > > >worker_info.test_cpl;
> > > > +
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < nb_workers; i++)
> > > > + worker_params[i]->worker_info.stop_flag = true;
> > > > +
> > > > + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
> > > > +
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < nb_workers; i++) {
> > > > + calc_result(buf_size, nr_buf, nb_workers, test_secs,
> > > > + worker_params[i]->worker_info.test_cpl,
> > > > + &memory, &avg_cycles, &bandwidth, &mops);
> > > > + output_result(cfg->scenario_id,
> > > > worker_params[i]->lcore_id,
> > > > + worker_params[i]->dma_name,
> > > > avg_cycles, buf_size,
> > > > + nr_buf / nb_workers, memory,
> > > > bandwidth, mops, is_dma);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > +out:
> > > > + /* free env */
> > > > + if (srcs)
> > > > + rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(srcs, nr_buf);
> > > > + if (dsts)
> > > > + rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(dsts, nr_buf);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (src_pool)
> > > > + rte_mempool_free(src_pool);
> > > > + if (dst_pool)
> > > > + rte_mempool_free(dst_pool);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (is_dma) {
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < nb_workers; i++) {
> > > > + printf("Stopping dmadev %d\n", ldm->dma_ids[i]);
> > > > + rte_dma_stop(ldm->dma_ids[i]);
> > >
> > > [Amit]: Below rte_dma_stop please call rte_dma_close for clean exit.
> > >
> >
> > [Cheng] Sure, I'll fix it in the next version.
>
> [Cheng] We are not planning to exit here, we are just going to do the next
> test, so we shouldn't call the rte_dma_close(). Just clarify. And when we
> finished all the test, we will call the rte_eal_cleanup() which will call the
> rte_dma_close(). Thanks!
[Amit]: Sure, thanks.
>
> >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > > +#endif /* _MAIN_H_ */
> > > > diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/meson.build b/app/test-dma-
> > > > perf/meson.build new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..bd6c264002
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/app/test-dma-perf/meson.build
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause # Copyright(c) 2019-2023
> > > > +Intel Corporation
> > > > +
> > > > +# meson file, for building this app as part of a main DPDK build.
> > > > +
> > > > +if is_windows
> > > > + build = false
> > > > + reason = 'not supported on Windows'
> > > > + subdir_done()
> > > > +endif
> > > > +
> > > > +deps += ['dmadev', 'mbuf', 'cfgfile']
> > > > +
> > > > +sources = files(
> > > > + 'main.c',
> > > > + 'benchmark.c',
> > > > +)
> > > > --
> > > > 2.40.1
