On Fri, 25 Dec 2020 07:20:57 +0000 "Peng, ZhihongX" <zhihongx.p...@intel.com> wrote:
> The performance of our simple scheme is better than asan. We are trying the > asan solution. > > Regards, > Peng,Zhihong Closing this RFC, not much has changed after 5 years. Your solution adds locking and only catches small overruns it doesn't address the bigger set of use after free issues. If you can come up with a faster and more complete solution it would be good to have.
