On 5/15/2023 9:16 AM, Sachin Saxena (OSS) wrote:
> On 5/8/2023 4:11 PM, Tianli Lai wrote:
>> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking
>> links or opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using
>> the 'Report this email' button
>>
>>
>> this threshold value can be changed with function argument nb_rx_desc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tianli Lai <laitia...@tom.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/dpaa2/dpaa2_ethdev.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/dpaa2/dpaa2_ethdev.c
>> b/drivers/net/dpaa2/dpaa2_ethdev.c
>> index 679f33ae1a..ad892ded4a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/dpaa2/dpaa2_ethdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/dpaa2/dpaa2_ethdev.c
>> @@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ dpaa2_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>> dpaa2_q->cgid,
>> &taildrop);
>> } else {
>> /*enabling per rx queue congestion control */
>> - taildrop.threshold = CONG_THRESHOLD_RX_BYTES_Q;
>> + taildrop.threshold = nb_rx_desc * 1024;
>> taildrop.units = DPNI_CONGESTION_UNIT_BYTES;
>> taildrop.oal = CONG_RX_OAL;
>> DPAA2_PMD_DEBUG("Enabling Byte based Drop on
>> queue= %d",
>> --
>> 2.27.0
>>
> Hi Tianli,
>
> The number of bytes based tail drop threshold value
> "CONG_THRESHOLD_RX_BYTES_Q" is an optimized value for dpaa2 platform. we
> concluded this value after multiple benchmark experiments in past.
> Although, number of frame based threshold value is "nb_rx_desc" based only.
> We will further review this suggestion and get back.
>
Hi Sachin, What is the status of this patch?
