On 6/7/23 10:05, David Marchand wrote:
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 10:19 AM Maxime Coquelin
<maxime.coque...@redhat.com> wrote:

This series introduces a new type of backend, VDUSE,
to the Vhost library.

VDUSE stands for vDPA device in Userspace, it enables
implementing a Virtio device in userspace and have it
attached to the Kernel vDPA bus.

Once attached to the vDPA bus, it can be used either by
Kernel Virtio drivers, like virtio-net in our case, via
the virtio-vdpa driver. Doing that, the device is visible
to the Kernel networking stack and is exposed to userspace
as a regular netdev.

It can also be exposed to userspace thanks to the
vhost-vdpa driver, via a vhost-vdpa chardev that can be
passed to QEMU or Virtio-user PMD.

While VDUSE support is already available in upstream
Kernel, a couple of patches are required to support
network device type:

https://gitlab.com/mcoquelin/linux/-/tree/vduse_networking_rfc

In order to attach the created VDUSE device to the vDPA
bus, a recent iproute2 version containing the vdpa tool is
required.

Benchmark results:
==================

On this v2, PVP reference benchmark has been run & compared with
Vhost-user.

When doing macswap forwarding in the worload, no difference is seen.
When doing io forwarding in the workload, we see 4% performance
degradation with VDUSE, comapred to Vhost-user/Virtio-user. It is
explained by the use of the IOTLB layer in the Vhost-library when using
VDUSE, whereas Vhost-user/Virtio-user does not make use of it.

Usage:
======

1. Probe required Kernel modules
# modprobe vdpa
# modprobe vduse
# modprobe virtio-vdpa

2. Build (require vduse kernel headers to be available)
# meson build
# ninja -C build

3. Create a VDUSE device (vduse0) using Vhost PMD with
testpmd (with 4 queue pairs in this example)
# ./build/app/dpdk-testpmd --no-pci 
--vdev=net_vhost0,iface=/dev/vduse/vduse0,queues=4 --log-level=*:9  -- -i 
--txq=4 --rxq=4

9 is a nice but undefined value. 8 is enough.
In general, I prefer "human readable" strings, like *:debug ;-).



4. Attach the VDUSE device to the vDPA bus
# vdpa dev add name vduse0 mgmtdev vduse
=> The virtio-net netdev shows up (eth0 here)
# ip l show eth0
21: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP mode 
DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
     link/ether c2:73:ea:a7:68:6d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

5. Start/stop traffic in testpmd
testpmd> start
testpmd> show port stats 0
   ######################## NIC statistics for port 0  ########################
   RX-packets: 11         RX-missed: 0          RX-bytes:  1482
   RX-errors: 0
   RX-nombuf:  0
   TX-packets: 1          TX-errors: 0          TX-bytes:  62

   Throughput (since last show)
   Rx-pps:            0          Rx-bps:            0
   Tx-pps:            0          Tx-bps:            0
   ############################################################################
testpmd> stop

6. Detach the VDUSE device from the vDPA bus
# vdpa dev del vduse0

7. Quit testpmd
testpmd> quit

Known issues & remaining work:
==============================
- Fix issue in FD manager (still polling while FD has been removed)
- Add Netlink support in Vhost library
- Support device reconnection
  -> a temporary patch to support reconnection via a tmpfs file is available,
     upstream solution would be in-kernel and is being developed.
  -> 
https://gitlab.com/mcoquelin/dpdk-next-virtio/-/commit/5ad06ce14159a9ce36ee168dd13ef389cec91137
- Support packed ring
- Provide more performance benchmark results

We are missing a reference to the kernel patches required to have
vduse accept net devices.

Right, I mention it in the cover letter, but it should be in the release
note also. I propose to append this to the release note:
"While VDUSE support is already available in upstream Kernel, a couple
of patches are required to support network device type, which are being
upstreamed: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230419134329.346825-1-maxime.coque...@redhat.com/";

Does that sound good to you?

Thanks,
Maxime


I had played with the patches at v1 and it was working ok.
I did not review in depth the latest revisions, but I followed your
series from the PoC/start.
Overall, the series lgtm.

For the series,
Acked-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>



Reply via email to