On 23/11/15 14:46, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-11-23 15:17, Thomas Monjalon: >> Yes, it is a totally new work and it probably needs more time to have a >> design working well for most of use cases. >> As I already discussed with Olivier, I think it should be considered as >> experimental. It means we can try it but do not consider it as a stable >> API. So the deprecation process would not apply until the experimental >> flag is removed. > > If nobody complains, I'll apply this v7 and will send a patch to add some > experimental markers. > >> For the release 2.2, it would be better to remove the crypto dependency >> in mbuf. Do you think it is possible? > > Sorry, forget it, the dependency is in mbuf_offload. >
That sounds good to me, thanks Thomas!
