On 5/29/2023 7:12 AM, Ori Kam wrote:
> Hi Suanming,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Suanming Mou <suanmi...@nvidia.com>
>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2023 6:18 AM
>>
>> As indirect action conf fills the indirect action handler, while
>> converting indirect action, the action conf(action handler) should
>> be copied from original indirect action conf instead of duplicating
>> the action handler memory.
>>
>> Fixes: 4b61b8774be9 ("ethdev: introduce indirect flow action")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suanming Mou <suanmi...@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>  lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c | 10 +++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
>> index 69e6e749f7..ff740f19a4 100644
>> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
>> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
>> @@ -889,7 +889,15 @@ rte_flow_conv_actions(struct rte_flow_action *dst,
>>      src -= num;
>>      dst -= num;
>>      do {
>> -            if (src->conf) {
>> +            if (src->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_INDIRECT) {
>> +                    /*
>> +                     * Indirect action conf fills the indirect action
>> +                     * handler. Copy the action handle directly instead
>> +                     * of duplicating the pointer memory.
>> +                     */
>> +                    if (size)
>> +                            dst->conf = src->conf;
>> +            } else if (src->conf) {
>>                      off = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(off, sizeof(double));
>>                      ret = rte_flow_conv_action_conf
>>                              ((void *)(data + off),
>> --
>> 2.25.1
> 
> Acked-by: Ori Kam <or...@nvidia.com>
> 

Applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.

Reply via email to