On 5/31/23 08:19, Xia, Chenbo wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 11:17 PM
To: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; Eelco Chaudron
<echau...@redhat.com>; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo....@intel.com>;
david.march...@redhat.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] vhost: add device op to offload the interrupt
kick



On 5/30/23 15:16, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
30/05/2023 15:02, Maxime Coquelin:

On 5/17/23 11:09, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
This patch adds an operation callback which gets called every time the
library wants to call eventfd_write(). This eventfd_write() call could
result in a system call, which could potentially block the PMD thread.

The callback function can decide whether it's ok to handle the
eventfd_write() now or have the newly introduced function,
rte_vhost_notify_guest(), called at a later time.

This can be used by 3rd party applications, like OVS, to avoid system
calls being called as part of the PMD threads.

Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echau...@redhat.com>
---
    lib/vhost/meson.build |    2 ++
    lib/vhost/rte_vhost.h |   23 +++++++++++++++++-
    lib/vhost/socket.c    |   63
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
    lib/vhost/version.map |    9 +++++++
    lib/vhost/vhost.c     |   38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    lib/vhost/vhost.h     |   58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
-------
    6 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)



The patch looks good to me, but that's the first time we use function
versioning in Vhost library, so I'd like another pair of eyes to be
sure
I don't miss anything.

Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>

Thomas, do we need to mention it somewhere in the release note?

If compatibility is kept, I think we don't need to mention it.



Thanks Thomas for the information.

Maxime

About release note, except the versioning, there is also one new API introduced
in this patch, so we still need to mention this in release note

Right, good catch.
Eelco, let me know what you would put, I'll add it while applying (No
need for a new revision).

Thanks,
Maxime

Thanks,
Chenbo

Reply via email to