> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xing, Beilei <beilei.x...@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2023 3:39 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing <jingjing...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Liu, Mingxia <mingxia....@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei
> <beilei.x...@intel.com>; Wang, Xiao W <xiao.w.w...@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v4 13/13] net/cpfl: support hairpin bind/unbind
>
> From: Beilei Xing <beilei.x...@intel.com>
>
> This patch supports hairpin_bind/unbind ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.w...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Beilei Xing <beilei.x...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_rxtx.c | 28 +++++++
> drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_rxtx.h | 2 +
> 3 files changed, 167 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c
> index
> d6dc1672f1..4b70441e27 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c
> @@ -1114,6 +1114,141 @@ cpfl_hairpin_get_peer_ports(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev, uint16_t *peer_ports,
> return j;
> }
>
>
> static int
> diff --git a/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_rxtx.c index
> 38c48ad8c7..ef83a03c2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_rxtx.c
> @@ -1011,6 +1011,34 @@ cpfl_switch_hairpin_bufq_complq(struct cpfl_vport
> *cpfl_vport, bool on)
> return err;
> }
>
> +int
> +cpfl_switch_hairpin_complq(struct cpfl_vport *cpfl_vport, bool on) {
> + struct idpf_vport *vport = &cpfl_vport->base;
> + uint32_t type;
> + int err, queue_id;
> +
> + type = VIRTCHNL2_QUEUE_TYPE_TX_COMPLETION;
> + queue_id = cpfl_vport->p2p_tx_complq->queue_id;
> + err = idpf_vc_ena_dis_one_queue(vport, queue_id, type, on);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +cpfl_switch_hairpin_bufq(struct cpfl_vport *cpfl_vport, bool on) {
> + struct idpf_vport *vport = &cpfl_vport->base;
> + uint32_t type;
> + int err, queue_id;
> +
> + type = VIRTCHNL2_QUEUE_TYPE_RX_BUFFER;
> + queue_id = cpfl_vport->p2p_rx_bufq->queue_id;
> + err = idpf_vc_ena_dis_one_queue(vport, queue_id, type, on);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
[Liu, Mingxia] Can cpfl_switch_hairpin_bufq_complq() in patch 9/13 be optimized
by calling cpfl_switch_hairpin_complq() and cpfl_switch_hairpin_bufq()?
> int
> cpfl_switch_hairpin_rxtx_queue(struct cpfl_vport *cpfl_vport, uint16_t
> logic_qid,
> bool rx, bool on)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_rxtx.h b/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_rxtx.h index
> 42dfd07155..86e97541c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_rxtx.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/cpfl/cpfl_rxtx.h
> @@ -114,6 +114,8 @@ int cpfl_hairpin_txq_config(struct idpf_vport *vport,
> struct cpfl_tx_queue *cpfl int cpfl_hairpin_rx_bufq_config(struct cpfl_vport
> *cpfl_vport); int cpfl_hairpin_rxq_config(struct idpf_vport *vport, struct
> cpfl_rx_queue *cpfl_rxq); int cpfl_switch_hairpin_bufq_complq(struct
> cpfl_vport *cpfl_vport, bool on);
> +int cpfl_switch_hairpin_complq(struct cpfl_vport *cpfl_vport, bool on);
> +int cpfl_switch_hairpin_bufq(struct cpfl_vport *cpfl_vport, bool on);
> int cpfl_switch_hairpin_rxtx_queue(struct cpfl_vport *cpfl_vport, uint16_t
> qid,
> bool rx, bool on);
> #endif /* _CPFL_RXTX_H_ */
> --
> 2.26.2
