On Thu, 25 May 2023 08:15:07 +0000 Anoob Joseph <ano...@marvell.com> wrote:
> [Anoob] With PDCP (& most other protocols), we have to update the states > atomically. Application designers would have a choice of either use single > thread or do multi-thread processing. If the library is designed for > multi-thread and if application uses only single thread, then there would be > unnecessary overheads from library. If library sticks to single-thread and if > application needs more threads for scaling, then again it would become a > library issue. > > Is your issue with providing such an option or is it about how it is > implemented? IPsec also has a similar challenge and similar per SA > configuration is provided in lib IPsec as well. If you want to provide unlocked access, then it should be done with another set of API's. The cost of conditional branch will be higher than atomic some times.
