Hello guys, On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 12:31 PM David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> wrote: > > As reported by Ilya [1], unconditionally calling > rte_flow_get_restore_info() impacts an application performance for drivers > that do not provide this ops. > It could also impact processing of packets that require no call to > rte_flow_get_restore_info() at all. > > Advertise in mbuf (via a dynamic flag) whether the driver has more > metadata to provide via rte_flow_get_restore_info(). > The application can then call it only when required. > > Link: http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/5248c2ca-f2a6-3fb0-38b8-7f659bfa4...@ovn.org/ > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> > --- > Note: I did not test this RFC patch yet but I hope we can resume and > maybe conclude on the discussion for the tunnel offloading API.
Any comment? Thanks. -- David Marchand
