On 5/16/2023 6:32 PM, Joshua Washington wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I believe my original solution was something closer to what you are
> suggesting for backward compatibility. I originally had a flag that
> enabled changing source port instead of source IP addresses, but I
> received feedback that adding an extra flag was complicating things too
> much from Stephen.
> 
> On a VM, the purpose of using multi-flow is similar to that of bare
> metal: to test RSS in the RX side. However, generating traffic by
> changing source IP address can cause inconsistencies in performance due
> to protections in cloud infrastructure from sending packets from a
> different source IP address than is provisioned for the VM. Changing
> source UDP port to test RSS should be functionally equivalent while
> allowing VMs to send traffic from a single source IP address.
> 
> If everyone agrees that adding --txonly-multi-flow as an option as well
> as keeping the flag is an acceptable way of moving forward, I can do that.
> 

Hi Joshua,

I missed the first version of the patch and the comment, thinking twice
comment has a point, I was thinking some users doing RSS based on IP but
probably all supports RSS based on UDP too. Better to keep simple.

Lets proceed with latest version, I will put some comments on it.

Thanks,
Ferruh

Reply via email to