On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 04:53:20PM +0000, Gilbert Carrillo wrote: > Make static returns an error (see attached). > > v/R, > Gilbert >
JFYI, best practice is to reply below last message when replying in mailing list. It just makes it easier for readers to follow the conversation as it flows from top to bottom. Looks like we are missing libelf in the linker command when using "make static". May need some investigation. > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com> > Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 10:35 AM > To: Gilbert Carrillo <gcarri...@ampex.com> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: DPDK 22.11 Troubleshooting > > On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 04:22:05PM +0000, Gilbert Carrillo wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > > > Thank you for the response. > > > > There is no errors when I run the makefile, however I do see a difference > > in the programs. I don't believe the makefile is linking all the libraries > > together as intended. > > > > For example, when I run the ethtool sample program and compile it using > > meson, it works fine and rte_eth_dev_count_avail() returns the correct > > amount. However, when I compile ethtool with the makefile and run it > > rte_eth_dev_count_avail() returns 0. > > > > Note that by default the meson build will statically link the examples, while > the makefile will dynamically load the drivers at runtime. That may explain > the difference. Can you try building and running using "make static" rather > than just "make". > > /Bruce
