Hi Stephen, Thomas, Brice,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 1:06 AM
> To: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>; Thomas Monjalon
> <tho...@monjalon.net>
> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> david.march...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] usertools: enhance CPU layout
> 
> Le 21/04/2023 à 17:15, Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
> >
> >>> Better to understand more about our opinion of this script before send a
> v2 patch.
> >>> I've used 'lstopo'. It's a great tool.
> >>> To my opinion, considering there're Linux tools to show all kinds of
> information, the reason that DPDK has its own tool is to summarize and
> emphasize the information that is important to DPDK. Here it's that some cores
> are more powerful than others. When the users use a testpmd-like APP, they
> can choose the appropriate cores after DPDK reminds them about the
> difference between cores.
> >>> Add Thomas for more suggestions. Thanks.
> >> Adding Brice, hwloc maintainer.
> >>
> >> I think it would be better to contribute to the hwloc project.
> >> If we need a different set of info, we can probably tune it with options.
> > The script had a purpose which was back when DPDK was first started.
> > But as systems get more complex, it becomes something that has to deal
> > with lots of corner cases; and if some other tool can it then that is 
> > better.
> 
> 
> Hello
> 
> Indeed, hwloc/lstopo should be able to do something similar to that script. I
> didn't see anything network-related in the script, does it only show CPU info?
Yes, this script shows only CPU info.
Agree that 'lstopo' already shows everything that this script can show.

> 
> Regarding the original patch, we already support all levels or caches, dies,
> clusters, etc. Hybrid CPUs are also detected but they are only nicely shown in
> the graphical output [1]. The textual output only says at the very end that 
> there
> are two kinds and the bitmask of CPUs for each. I am open to improving this.
> 
> Brice
> 
> [1] https://twitter.com/bgoglin/status/1542117836008706049/photo/1

Brice, Thomas, Stephen, many thanks for your reply and comments.
As cpu_layout.py has been planned to be removed, and the work can been done by 
'lstopo', I'll withdraw this patch.

Reply via email to