On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:54:13 +0100
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 07:52:30AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 10:43:43 +0200
> > Volodymyr Fialko <vfia...@marvell.com> wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/lib/reorder/rte_reorder.c b/lib/reorder/rte_reorder.c
> > > index f55f383700..7418202b04 100644
> > > --- a/lib/reorder/rte_reorder.c
> > > +++ b/lib/reorder/rte_reorder.c
> > > @@ -46,9 +46,10 @@ struct rte_reorder_buffer {
> > > char name[RTE_REORDER_NAMESIZE];
> > > uint32_t min_seqn; /**< Lowest seq. number that can be in the buffer */
> > > unsigned int memsize; /**< memory area size of reorder buffer */
> > > + int is_initialized; /**< flag indicates that buffer was initialized */
> > > +
> > > struct cir_buffer ready_buf; /**< temp buffer for dequeued entries */
> > > struct cir_buffer order_buf; /**< buffer used to reorder entries */
> > > - int is_initialized;
> > > } __rte_cache_aligned;
> > >
> > > static void
> >
> > Since this is ABI change it will have to wait for 23.11 release
>
> It shouldn't be an ABI change. This struct is defined in a C file, rather
> than a header, so is not exposed to end applications.
>
> /Bruce
Sorry, Bruce is right.
You might want to use uint8_t or bool for a simple flag.
