On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 12:52:06PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > Hello Tyler, > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 9:52 AM David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 5:13 PM Gaëtan Rivet <gr...@u256.net> wrote: > > > Ah ok, so if I understand correctly, DPDK would need to declare some > > > '__rte_lockable rte_mutex' and associated functions for transparent > > > support, > > > to wrap above the pthread API. > > > > Yes, this is what I had in mind for the mid/long term but it was too > > late for 23.03 after -rc1. > > > > The Windows porting effort will probably need this abstraction too as > > we are trying to stop relying on the pthread API. > > I don't see this item in Microsoft roadmap, though. > > Do you have an opinion on this topic?
Sorry David I got distracted I'll review the thread again. I think with Windows toolsets we left off with expanding empty for now? Anyway, I'll take another pass today if I get a chance. > > Thanks. > > -- > David Marchand
