On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:21:24 +0000 "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara at intel.com> wrote:
> > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matthew Hall [mailto:mhall at mhcomputing.net] > > Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 6:49 PM > > To: Mcnamara, John > > Cc: Stephen Hemminger; Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Coverity policy for upstream (base) drivers. > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:12:04AM +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote: > > > If people haven't already done so I would urge them to sign up and > > view/fix the defects. > > > > > > https://scan.coverity.com/users/sign_up > > > https://scan.coverity.com/projects/4005 (DPDK) > > > > Hi John, > > > > I got signed up. Thanks for spearheading this. > > > > From past experience squashing SA defects on my own code and several > > previous employers I would like to recommend we band together and > > configure a SonarQube instance. > > Hi Matthew, > > I definitely be interested in getting SonarQube working with DPDK. We can > sync up on this as soon as the 2.2 bush fires die down. > > John. It looked like SonarQube was both non-free for doing any real scans, and the default C rules were oriented towards a completely different Windows oriented coding style.
