Replace the use of rte_atomic.h types and functions, instead use GCC
supplied C++11 memory model builtins.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Retzlaff <roret...@linux.microsoft.com>
---
lib/stack/rte_stack_lf_generic.h | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/stack/rte_stack_lf_generic.h b/lib/stack/rte_stack_lf_generic.h
index 7fa29ce..3ef0f74 100644
--- a/lib/stack/rte_stack_lf_generic.h
+++ b/lib/stack/rte_stack_lf_generic.h
@@ -26,8 +26,7 @@
* elements. If the mempool is near-empty to the point that this is a
* concern, the user should consider increasing the mempool size.
*/
- return (unsigned int)rte_atomic64_read((rte_atomic64_t *)
- &s->stack_lf.used.len);
+ return __atomic_load_n(&s->stack_lf.used.len, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
}
static __rte_always_inline void
@@ -68,7 +67,7 @@
__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
} while (success == 0);
- rte_atomic64_add((rte_atomic64_t *)&list->len, num);
+ __atomic_fetch_add(&list->len, num, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
}
static __rte_always_inline struct rte_stack_lf_elem *
@@ -82,14 +81,14 @@
/* Reserve num elements, if available */
while (1) {
- uint64_t len = rte_atomic64_read((rte_atomic64_t *)&list->len);
+ uint64_t len = __atomic_load_n(&list->len, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
/* Does the list contain enough elements? */
if (unlikely(len < num))
return NULL;
- if (rte_atomic64_cmpset((volatile uint64_t *)&list->len,
- len, len - num))
+ if (__atomic_compare_exchange_n(&list->len, &len, len - num,
+ 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST))
break;
}
--
1.8.3.1
