> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tyler Retzlaff <roret...@linux.microsoft.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 8:48 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>; tho...@monjalon.net; 
> Tyler
> Retzlaff <roret...@linux.microsoft.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 11/17] net/iavf: use previous value atomic fetch operations
> 
> Use __atomic_fetch_{add,and,or,sub,xor} instead of 
> __atomic_{add,and,or,sub,xor}_fetch
> when we have no interest in the result of the operation.
> 
> Reduces unnecessary codegen that provided the result of the atomic operation 
> that was not
> used.
> 
> Change brings closer alignment with atomics available in C11 standard and 
> will reduce
> review effort when they are integrated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Retzlaff <roret...@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/iavf/iavf_vchnl.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_vchnl.c b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_vchnl.c 
> index
> 9adaadb..73875d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_vchnl.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_vchnl.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ struct iavf_event_handler {
>       int err = pipe(handler->fd);
>  #endif
>       if (err != 0) {
> -             __atomic_sub_fetch(&handler->ndev, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> +             __atomic_fetch_sub(&handler->ndev, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
>               return -1;
>       }
> 
> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ struct iavf_event_handler {
> 
>       if (rte_ctrl_thread_create(&handler->tid, "iavf-event-thread",
>                               NULL, iavf_dev_event_handle, NULL)) {
> -             __atomic_sub_fetch(&handler->ndev, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> +             __atomic_fetch_sub(&handler->ndev, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
>               return -1;
>       }
> 
> @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ struct iavf_event_handler {
>                               /* read message and it's expected one */
>                               if (msg_opc == vf->pend_cmd) {
>                                       uint32_t cmd_count =
> -                                     __atomic_sub_fetch(&vf->pend_cmd_count,
> +                                     __atomic_fetch_sub(&vf->pend_cmd_count,

It doesn't apply here. The return value is used.
The rest of the series looks good to me.

>                                                       1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
>                                       if (cmd_count == 0)
>                                               _notify_cmd(vf, msg_ret);
> --
> 1.8.3.1

Reply via email to