On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 2:56 PM <jer...@marvell.com> wrote:
>
> From: Jerin Jacob <jer...@marvell.com>
>
> Based on TB meeting[1] action item, defining
> the process for new library approval in principle.
>
> [1]
> https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2023-January/260035.html


Ping for review.


>
> Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jer...@marvell.com>
> ---
>  content/process/_index.md | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 content/process/_index.md
>
> diff --git a/content/process/_index.md b/content/process/_index.md
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..21c2642
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/content/process/_index.md
> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> ++++
> +title = "Process"
> +weight = "9"
> ++++
> +
> +## Process for new library approval in principle
> +
> +### Rational
> +
> +Adding a new library to DPDK codebase with proper RFC and then full 
> patch-sets is
> +significant work and getting early approval-in-principle that a library help 
> DPDK contributors
> +avoid wasted effort if it is not suitable for various reasons.
> +
> +### Process
> +
> +1. When a contributor would like to add a new library to DPDK code base, the 
> contributor must send
> +the following items to DPDK mailing list for TB approval-in-principle.
> +
> +   - Purpose of the library.
> +   - Scope of the library.
> +   - Any licensing constraints.
> +   - Justification for adding to DPDK.
> +   - Any other implementations of the same functionality in other 
> libs/products and how this version differs.
> +   - Public API specification header file as RFC
> +       - Optional and good to have.
> +       - TB may additionally request this collateral if needed to get more 
> clarity on scope and purpose.
> +
> +2. TB to schedule discussion on this in upcoming TB meeting along with 
> author. Based on the TB
> +schedule and/or author availability, TB may need maximum three TB meeting 
> slots.
> +
> +3. Based on mailing list and TB meeting discussions, TB to vote for 
> approval-in-principle and share
> +the decision in the mailing list.
> +
> --
> 2.39.1
>

Reply via email to