03/02/2023 16:12, Bruce Richardson: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 03:03:38PM +0000, Van Haaren, Harry wrote: > > From: Van Haaren, Harry > > > > <snip> > > > > > > The timeout approach just does not have its place in a functional test. > > > > Either this test is rewritten, or it must go to the performance tests > > > > list so that we stop getting false positives. > > > > Can you work on this? > > > > > > I'll investigate various approaches on Thursday and reply here with > > > suggested > > > next steps. > > > > I've identified 3 checks that fail in CI (from the above log outputs), all > > 3 cases > > Have different dlays: 100 ms delay, 200 ms delay and 1000ms. > > In the CI, the service-core just hasn't been scheduled (yet) and causes the > > "failure". > > For me, the question is - why hasn't the service-core been scheduled? Can > we use sched-yield or some other mechanism to force a wakeup of it?
Harry, you didn't reply to this question please.
