Hi Maxime,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2023 10:33 AM
> To: Vargas, Hernan <hernan.var...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> gak...@marvell.com; Rix, Tom <t...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chau...@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/16] test/bbdev: add timeout for latency tests
>
>
>
> On 2/15/23 18:09, Hernan Vargas wrote:
> > Add a timeout to force exit the latency tests in case dequeue never
> > happens.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.var...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > index 19b9a5b119..dede0f900e 100644
> > --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> >
> > #define MAX_QUEUES RTE_MAX_LCORE
> > #define TEST_REPETITIONS 100
> > +#define TIME_OUT_POLL 1e8
> > #define WAIT_OFFLOAD_US 1000
> >
> > #ifdef RTE_BASEBAND_FPGA_LTE_FEC
> > @@ -4546,6 +4547,7 @@ latency_test_ldpc_dec(struct rte_mempool
> > *mempool,
> >
> > for (i = 0, dequeued = 0; dequeued < num_to_process; ++i) {
> > uint16_t enq = 0, deq = 0;
> > + uint32_t time_out = 0;
> > bool first_time = true;
> > last_time = 0;
> >
> > @@ -4597,7 +4599,8 @@ latency_test_ldpc_dec(struct rte_mempool
> *mempool,
> > last_time = rte_rdtsc_precise() - start_time;
> > first_time = false;
> > }
> > - } while (unlikely(burst_sz != deq));
> > + time_out++;
> > + } while ((burst_sz != deq) && (time_out < TIME_OUT_POLL));
> >
> > *max_time = RTE_MAX(*max_time, last_time);
> > *min_time = RTE_MIN(*min_time, last_time); @@ -4606,7
> +4609,12 @@
> > latency_test_ldpc_dec(struct rte_mempool *mempool,
> > if (extDdr)
> > retrieve_harq_ddr(dev_id, queue_id, ops_enq,
> burst_sz);
> >
> > - if (test_vector.op_type != RTE_BBDEV_OP_NONE) {
> > + if (burst_sz != deq) {
> > + struct rte_bbdev_info info;
> > + ret = TEST_FAILED;
> > + rte_bbdev_info_get(dev_id, &info);
>
> What is the point of calling rte_bbdev_info_get() here and below?
> info is not used afterwards.
The reason for calling this function is to check the device status and if there
is something wrong the PMD would display it to standard output.
>
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Dequeue timeout!");
> > + } else if (test_vector.op_type != RTE_BBDEV_OP_NONE) {
> > ret = validate_ldpc_dec_op(ops_deq, burst_sz,
> ref_op,
> > vector_mask);
> > TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Validation failed!"); @@
> -4632,6
> > +4640,7 @@ latency_test_enc(struct rte_mempool *mempool,
> >
> > for (i = 0, dequeued = 0; dequeued < num_to_process; ++i) {
> > uint16_t enq = 0, deq = 0;
> > + uint32_t time_out = 0;
> > bool first_time = true;
> > last_time = 0;
> >
> > @@ -4667,13 +4676,18 @@ latency_test_enc(struct rte_mempool
> *mempool,
> > last_time += rte_rdtsc_precise() - start_time;
> > first_time = false;
> > }
> > - } while (unlikely(burst_sz != deq));
> > + time_out++;
> > + } while ((burst_sz != deq) && (time_out < TIME_OUT_POLL));
> >
> > *max_time = RTE_MAX(*max_time, last_time);
> > *min_time = RTE_MIN(*min_time, last_time);
> > *total_time += last_time;
> > -
> > - if (test_vector.op_type != RTE_BBDEV_OP_NONE) {
> > + if (burst_sz != deq) {
> > + struct rte_bbdev_info info;
> > + ret = TEST_FAILED;
> > + rte_bbdev_info_get(dev_id, &info);
>
> Same here.
>
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Dequeue timeout!");
> > + } else if (test_vector.op_type != RTE_BBDEV_OP_NONE) {
> > ret = validate_enc_op(ops_deq, burst_sz, ref_op);
> > TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Validation failed!");
> > }
