2015-11-10 10:22, Hunt, David: > On 09/11/2015 17:46, Jan Viktorin wrote: > > Here is the log. You an see, that many tests fail just because > > of the missing hugetlb support. This is strange as I modified the > > autotest_runner.py to inject "--no-huge --no-pci" options when it > > detects armv7 architecture. > > I think publishing these test results to the mailing list confuses > matters somewhat. The tests are not tuned for armv7, and there are many > false negatives, giving the impression that the results are worse than > they actually should be. > > The tests need to be analysed to see if they respect the --no-huge and > --no-pci flags correctly, I suspect some tests are being run even though > these flags are enabled. > > I believe enough of the tests pass to allow the initial version of the > patch set to be accepted. We can look at the failing cases later, and > improve the test suite as time goes on.
I agree. The unit tests are know to require some refactoring. I suggest to continue ARM integration while checking how to fix the unit tests later. Maybe that Declan has some ideas or plans about the tests.
