Greetings,

Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa at igel.co.jp> writes:
> These variables are needed to be able to manage one of virtio devices
> using both vhost library APIs and vhost PMD.
> For example, if vhost PMD uses current callback handler and private data
> provided by vhost library, A DPDK application that links vhost library
> cannot use some of vhost library APIs. To avoid it, callback and private
> data for vhost PMD are needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa at igel.co.jp>
> ---
>  lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost_version.map        |  6 +++
>  lib/librte_vhost/rte_virtio_net.h             |  3 ++
>  lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/virtio-net-user.c | 13 +++----
>  lib/librte_vhost/virtio-net.c                 | 56 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  lib/librte_vhost/virtio-net.h                 |  4 +-
>  5 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost_version.map 
> b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost_version.map
> index 3d8709e..00a9ce5 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost_version.map
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost_version.map
> @@ -20,3 +20,9 @@ DPDK_2.1 {
>       rte_vhost_driver_unregister;
>  
>  } DPDK_2.0;
> +
> +DPDK_2.2 {
> +     global:
> +
> +     rte_vhost_driver_pmd_callback_register;
> +} DPDK_2.1;
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_virtio_net.h 
> b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_virtio_net.h
> index 5687452..3ef6e58 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_virtio_net.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_virtio_net.h
> @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ struct virtio_net {
>       char                    ifname[IF_NAME_SZ];     /**< Name of the tap 
> device or socket path. */
>       uint32_t                virt_qp_nb;     /**< number of queue pair we 
> have allocated */
>       void                    *priv;          /**< private context */
> +     void                    *pmd_priv;      /**< private context for vhost 
> PMD */
>       struct vhost_virtqueue  *virtqueue[VHOST_MAX_QUEUE_PAIRS * 2];  /**< 
> Contains all virtqueue information. */
>  } __rte_cache_aligned;

Sorry if I'm missing something, but this is an ABI breaker, isn't it? I
think this needs the RTE_NEXT_ABI tag around it.

Reply via email to