Hello Ferruh, What holds merge of https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=26763 ?
Regards, Gregory > -----Original Message----- > From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@amd.com> > Sent: Thursday, 9 February 2023 17:14 > To: Gregory Etelson <getel...@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Andrew > Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru> > Cc: Matan Azrad <ma...@nvidia.com>; Raslan Darawsheh > <rasl...@nvidia.com>; Ori Kam <or...@nvidia.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas > Monjalon (EXTERNAL) <tho...@monjalon.net> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] ethdev: add query and update sync and async > function calls > > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > On 2/2/2023 1:47 PM, Gregory Etelson wrote: > > Current API allows either query or update indirect flow action. > > If indirect action must be conditionally updated according to it's > > present state application must first issue action query then > > analyze returned data and if needed issue update request. > > When the update will be processed, action state can change and > > the update can invalidate the action. > > > > Add `rte_flow_action_handle_query_update` function call, > > and it's async version `rte_flow_async_action_handle_query_update` > > to atomically query and update flow action. > > > > Application can control query and update order, if that is supported > > by port hardware, by setting `qu_mode` parameter to > > RTE_FLOW_QU_QUERY_FIRST or RTE_FLOW_QU_UPDATE_FIRST. > > > > Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getel...@nvidia.com> > > Acked-by: Ori Kam <or...@nvidia.com> > > --- > > v2: Remove RTE_FLOW_QU_DEFAULT query-update mode. > > v3: Update release release notes. > > Fix doxygen errors. > > v4: Add returned errno codes. > > v5: Update the patch description. > > Fix typos. > > v6: Resolve merge conflict with the main branch. > > v7: Update documentation. > > v8: Style fixes. > > v9: Add parameters validation. > > v10: Code update. > > it seems there were some comments from Andrew to previous version, are > they resolved now? > > @Andrew, do you have any objection/comment on this version?
