> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx...@intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2023 2:23 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org; yidingx.z...@intel.com; Mingjin Ye
> <mingjinx...@intel.com>; Qiming Yang <qiming.y...@intel.com>; Qi Zhang
> <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] net/ice: fix get link status timeout
>
>
> When hw is just started, it will immediately obtain the link status, and the
> longest attempt is 1 second. Some NICs are slow to initialize, which make it
> fails
> to obtain the link status.
>
> The patch fixes this issue by modifying the longest attempt to 5 seconds.
>
> Fixes: cf911d90e366 ("net/ice: support link update")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c index
> 0bc739daf0..eaa556f45c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c
> @@ -3927,7 +3927,7 @@ static int
> ice_link_update(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, int wait_to_complete) { #define
> CHECK_INTERVAL 100 /* 100ms */ -#define MAX_REPEAT_TIME 10 /* 1s (10
> * 100ms) in total */
> +#define MAX_REPEAT_TIME 50 /* 5s (50 * 100ms) in total */
> struct ice_hw *hw = ICE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
> struct ice_link_status link_status;
> struct rte_eth_link link, old;
> --
> 2.25.1
Sorry for my mail client setting with last reply.
I think ice_link_update with wait_to_complete needs to be optimized
when ice_link_update.
Our system integrates dozens or more interfaces(E810), even if wait 1
second, the system starts very slowly.
