<snip> > Subject: Re: no printf in drivers code > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 5:40 PM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > wrote: > > > > 03/02/2023 17:18, Honnappa Nagarahalli: > > > From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > > > > > > > > We have too many drivers using printf() instead of rte_log(). > > > > Please propose a plan to replace or remove the calls to printf(). > > > > If no plan, I could propose one but you may not like it :) > > > > > > Does it make sense to add scripts to CI to capture this issue? > > > In general, we do not want printfs in DPDK code (other than tests, > > > sample apps?) > > > > It's difficult to automate because printfs are acceptable in dump > > functions, selftest, and testpmd code hosted in drivers directories. > > We can identify which parts need those, create dedicated helpers that do call > printf (but are excluded from the check), and and then the printf exclusion is > applied to the whole tree. +1
> > > -- > David Marchand
