On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 10:12 AM You, KaisenX <kaisenx....@intel.com> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
> > Sent: 2022年12月20日 18:33
> > To: You, KaisenX <kaisenx....@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@amd.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Burakov, Anatoly
> > <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org; Yang, Qiming
> > <qiming.y...@intel.com>; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.z...@intel.com>; Wu,
> > Jingjing <jingjing...@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei <beilei.x...@intel.com>;
> > Zhang,
> > Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>; Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>; Mcnamara,
> > John <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/iavf:fix slow memory allocation
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 11:12 AM You, KaisenX <kaisenx....@intel.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > I tried to play a bit with a E810 nic on a dual numa and I can't see
> > > > anything wrong for now.
> > > > Can you provide a simple and small reproducer of your issue?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > This is my environment:
> > > Enter "lscpu" on the command line:
> > > NUMA:
> > > NUMA node(s): 2
> > > NUMA node0 CPU(S) : 0-27,56-83
> > > NUMA node1 CPU(S) : 28-55,84-111
> > >
> > > List the steps to reproduce the issue:
> > >
> > > 1. create vf and blind to dpdk
> > > echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:ca\:00.0/sriov_ numvfs
> > > ./usertools/dpdk-devbind. py -b vfio-pci 0000:ca:01.0 2. launch
> > > testpmd ./x86_ 64-native-linuxapp-clang/app/dpdk-testpmd -l 28-48 -n 4
> > > -a 0000:ca:01.0 --file-prefix=dpdk_ 525342_ 20221104042659 -- -i
> > > --rxq=256 --txq=256
> > > --total-num-mbufs=500000
> > >
> > > Parameter Description:
> > > "-l 28-48":The range of parameter values after "-l" must be on "NUMA
> > node1 CPU(S)"
> > > "0000:ca:01.0":inset on node1
> > - Back to your topic.
> > Can you try this simple hack:
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/eal/common/eal_common_thread.c
> > b/lib/eal/common/eal_common_thread.c
> > index c5d8b4327d..92160c7fa6 100644
> > --- a/lib/eal/common/eal_common_thread.c
> > +++ b/lib/eal/common/eal_common_thread.c
> > @@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ static void *ctrl_thread_init(void *arg)
> > void *routine_arg = params->arg;
> >
> > __rte_thread_init(rte_lcore_id(), cpuset);
> > + RTE_PER_LCORE(_socket_id) = SOCKET_ID_ANY;
> > params->ret = pthread_setaffinity_np(pthread_self(),
> > sizeof(*cpuset),
> > cpuset);
> > if (params->ret != 0) {
> >
> Thanks for your advice.
>
> But this issue still exists after I tried.
Ok, I think I understand what is wrong... but I am still guessing as I
am not sure what your "issue" is.
Can you have a try with:
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20221221104858.296530-1-david.march...@redhat.com/
Thanks.
--
David Marchand
