From: Peng Zhang <peng.zh...@corigine.com>

In the description of nfp document, DPDK PMD supports that the PF
looks for a firmware file by the PCI name.

After this commit, it will looks for the PCI name format such as
pci-0000:04:00.0.nffw rather than pci-04:00.0.nffw, which will
keep consistent with what is written in the nfp.rst.

Fixes: 896c265ef954 ("net/nfp: use new CPP interface")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Peng Zhang <peng.zh...@corigine.com>
Reviewed-by: Chaoyong He <chaoyong...@corigine.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderl...@corigine.com>
---

v2:
* add fixline.

---

 drivers/net/nfp/nfp_ethdev.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/nfp/nfp_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/nfp/nfp_ethdev.c
index 0956ea81df..f22ae24b53 100644
--- a/drivers/net/nfp/nfp_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/nfp/nfp_ethdev.c
@@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ nfp_fw_upload(struct rte_pci_device *dev, struct nfp_nsp 
*nsp, char *card)
                goto load_fw;
        /* Then try the PCI name */
        snprintf(fw_name, sizeof(fw_name), "%s/pci-%s.nffw", DEFAULT_FW_PATH,
-                       dev->device.name);
+                       dev->name);
 
        PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "Trying with fw file: %s", fw_name);
        if (rte_firmware_read(fw_name, &fw_buf, &fsize) == 0)
-- 
2.27.0

Reply via email to