2015-11-03 12:19, David Marchand: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at > 6wind.com> > wrote: > > > 2015-10-29 09:55, David Marchand: > > > From: Maxime Leroy <maxime.leroy at 6wind.com> > > > > > > Some drivers like virtual ones don't specify any driver pointer in the > > > structure rte_eth_dev. > > > > > > To prevent segfault, we should check if this pointer is NULL before > > > dereferencing it. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Leroy <maxime.leroy at 6wind.com> > > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand at 6wind.com> > > > > It is not clear what the problem is. > > And the driver fields should probably be removed or changed as it too > > tigthly > > related to the PCI driver. > > > > It does look odd to me as well, quickly went through head, and did not see > a case where this could happen. > Maxime is not available at the moment, so I think I will just drop this > patch. > > How about this patchset rebased on head with just the first two patches ?
Perfect, thanks
