> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 2:31 PM
> To: Hanumanth Reddy Pothula <hpoth...@marvell.com>; Aman Singh
> <aman.deep.si...@intel.com>; Yuying Zhang <yuying.zh...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; tho...@monjalon.net; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
> <jer...@marvell.com>; Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram
> <ndabilpu...@marvell.com>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v13 1/1] app/testpmd: support multiple mbuf
> pools per Rx queue
>
> External Email
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> On 11/10/22 11:17, Hanumanth Pothula wrote:
> > Some of the HW has support for choosing memory pools based on the
> > packet's size. The pool sort capability allows PMD/NIC to choose a
> > memory pool based on the packet's length.
> >
> > On multiple mempool support enabled, populate mempool array
> > accordingly. Also, print pool name on which packet is received.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hanumanth Pothula <hpoth...@marvell.com>
> >
> > v13:
> > - Make sure protocol-based header split feature is not broken
> > by updating changes with latest code base.
> > v12:
> > - Process multi-segment configuration on number segments
> > (rx_pkt_nb_segs) greater than 1 or buffer split offload
> > flag (RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SPLIT) set.
> > v11:
> > - Resolve compilation and warning.
> > v10:
> > - Populate multi-mempool array based on mbuf_data_size_n instead
> > of rx_pkt_nb_segs.
>
> I'm sorry for inconvenience, could you rebase the patch on current next-
> net/main, please. I've decided to apply protocol based buffer split fix first.
> Of course, I can rebase myself, but I want result to be checked very carefully
> and tested properly. Thanks.
Sure will do that.
