Hi Nicolas,

On 11/3/22 15:59, Chautru, Nicolas wrote:
Hi Maxime,
-----Original Message-----
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2022 7:10 AM
To: Vargas, Hernan <hernan.var...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
gak...@marvell.com; t...@redhat.com
Cc: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chau...@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
<qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] baseband/acc100: add detection for deRM corner
cases



On 11/1/22 05:13, Hernan Vargas wrote:
Add function to detect if de-ratematch pre-processing is recommended
for SW corner cases.
Some specific 5GUL FEC corner cases may cause unintended back pressure
and in some cases a potential stability issue on the ACC100.
The PMD can detect such code block configuration and issue an info
message to the user.

Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.var...@intel.com>
---
   drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h     |  8 ++++
   drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 55
+++++++++++++++++++++++++--
   2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
b/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
index eae7eab4e9..6213b0b61e 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
@@ -123,6 +123,14 @@
   #define ACC_HARQ_ALIGN_64B          64
   #define ACC_MAX_ZC                  384

+/* De-ratematch code rate limitation for recommended operation */
+#define ACC_LIM_03 2  /* 0.03 */ #define ACC_LIM_09 6  /* 0.09 */
+#define ACC_LIM_14 9  /* 0.14 */ #define ACC_LIM_21 14 /* 0.21 */
+#define ACC_LIM_31 20 /* 0.31 */ #define ACC_MAX_E (128 * 1024 - 2)
+
   /* Helper macro for logging */
   #define rte_acc_log(level, fmt, ...) \
        rte_log(RTE_LOG_ ## level, RTE_LOG_NOTICE, fmt "\n", \ diff --git
a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index 23bc5d25bb..47609f95b7 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
@@ -756,6 +756,14 @@ acc100_queue_setup(struct rte_bbdev *dev,
uint16_t queue_id,
                ret = -ENOMEM;
                goto free_lb_out;
        }
+       q->derm_buffer = rte_zmalloc_socket(dev->device->driver->name,
+                       RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_MAX_CB_SIZE * 10,
+                       RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, conf->socket);
+       if (q->derm_buffer == NULL) {
+               rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Failed to allocate derm_buffer memory");
+               ret = -ENOMEM;
+               goto free_companion_ring_addr;
+       }

        /*
         * Software queue ring wraps synchronously with the HW when it
reaches @@ -776,7 +784,7 @@ acc100_queue_setup(struct rte_bbdev *dev,
uint16_t queue_id,
        q_idx = acc100_find_free_queue_idx(dev, conf);
        if (q_idx == -1) {
                ret = -EINVAL;
-               goto free_companion_ring_addr;
+               goto free_derm_buffer;
        }

        q->qgrp_id = (q_idx >> ACC100_GRP_ID_SHIFT) & 0xF; @@ -804,6
+812,9
@@ acc100_queue_setup(struct rte_bbdev *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
        dev->data->queues[queue_id].queue_private = q;
        return 0;

+free_derm_buffer:
+       rte_free(q->derm_buffer);
+       q->derm_buffer = NULL;
   free_companion_ring_addr:
        rte_free(q->companion_ring_addr);
        q->companion_ring_addr = NULL;
@@ -890,6 +901,7 @@ acc100_queue_release(struct rte_bbdev *dev,
uint16_t q_id)
                /* Mark the Queue as un-assigned */
                d->q_assigned_bit_map[q->qgrp_id] &= (0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF -
                                (uint64_t) (1 << q->aq_id));
+               rte_free(q->derm_buffer);
                rte_free(q->companion_ring_addr);
                rte_free(q->lb_in);
                rte_free(q->lb_out);
@@ -3111,10 +3123,41 @@ harq_loopback(struct acc_queue *q, struct
rte_bbdev_dec_op *op,
        return 1;
   }

+/* Assess whether a work around is recommended for the deRM corner
+cases */ static inline bool derm_workaround_recommended(struct
+rte_bbdev_op_ldpc_dec *ldpc_dec, struct acc_queue *q) {
+       if (!is_acc100(q))
+               return false;
+       int32_t e = ldpc_dec->cb_params.e;
+       int q_m = ldpc_dec->q_m;
+       int z_c = ldpc_dec->z_c;
+       int K = (ldpc_dec->basegraph == 1 ? ACC_K_ZC_1 : ACC_K_ZC_2) * z_c;
+       bool recommended = false;
+
+       if (ldpc_dec->basegraph == 1) {
+               if ((q_m == 4) && (z_c >= 320) && (e * ACC_LIM_31 > K * 64))
+                       recommended = true;
+               else if ((e * ACC_LIM_21 > K * 64))
+                       recommended = true;
+       } else {
+               if (q_m <= 2) {
+                       if ((z_c >= 208) && (e * ACC_LIM_09 > K * 64))
+                               recommended = true;
+                       else if ((z_c < 208) && (e * ACC_LIM_03 > K * 64))
+                               recommended = true;
+               } else if (e * ACC_LIM_14 > K * 64)
+                       recommended = true;
+       }
+
+       return recommended;
+}
+
   /** Enqueue one decode operations for ACC100 device in CB mode */
   static inline int
   enqueue_ldpc_dec_one_op_cb(struct acc_queue *q, struct
rte_bbdev_dec_op *op,
-               uint16_t total_enqueued_cbs, bool same_op)
+               uint16_t total_enqueued_cbs, bool same_op,
+               struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data)
   {
        int ret;
        if (unlikely(check_bit(op->ldpc_dec.op_flags,
@@ -3168,6 +3211,12 @@ enqueue_ldpc_dec_one_op_cb(struct acc_queue
*q, struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op,
        } else {
                struct acc_fcw_ld *fcw;
                uint32_t seg_total_left;
+
+               if (derm_workaround_recommended(&op->ldpc_dec, q)) {
+                       RTE_SET_USED(q_data);
Why do we need q_data if it is not being used?
As you can guess this notably allows customer do consider running deRM from 
here as a local patch hence keeping the q_data accessible.
Basically we keep the prototype of the function enqueue_ldpc_dec_one_op_cb() 
compatible with such usage.
I believe this is a good practice here. Let us know if you are not convinced.
I think it is better to just warn the user, without adding unused
parameters.

Thanks,
Maxime

Thanks
Nic

+                       rte_bbdev_log(INFO, "Corner case may require deRM
pre-processing");
+               }
+
                fcw = &desc->req.fcw_ld;
                q->d->fcw_ld_fill(op, fcw, harq_layout);

@@ -3721,7 +3770,7 @@ acc100_enqueue_ldpc_dec_cb(struct
rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
                        ops[i]->ldpc_dec.n_cb, ops[i]->ldpc_dec.q_m,
                        ops[i]->ldpc_dec.n_filler, ops[i]-
ldpc_dec.cb_params.e,
                        same_op);
-               ret = enqueue_ldpc_dec_one_op_cb(q, ops[i], i, same_op);
+               ret = enqueue_ldpc_dec_one_op_cb(q, ops[i], i, same_op,
q_data);
                if (ret < 0) {
                        acc_enqueue_invalid(q_data);
                        break;


Reply via email to