Will move to a new patch, and likely I opened in IDE again and it's
set up for the previous OSS project.
I got an email full of complaints from automated checkpatch, will
resubmit again early next week.
Best Regards
- David Miller
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 6:45 PM Stephen Hemminger
<step...@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 17:52:40 -0400
> David Miller <dmiller...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_cmdline.c b/app/test/test_cmdline.c
> > index 115bee966d..e0720ff345 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_cmdline.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_cmdline.c
> > @@ -10,21 +10,21 @@
> > static int
> > test_cmdline(void)
> > {
> > - printf("Testind parsing ethernet addresses...\n");
> > + printf("Testing parsing ethernet addresses...\n");
> > if (test_parse_etheraddr_valid() < 0)
> > return -1;
> > if (test_parse_etheraddr_invalid_data() < 0)
> > return -1;
> > if (test_parse_etheraddr_invalid_param() < 0)
> > return -1;
> > - printf("Testind parsing port lists...\n");
> > + printf("Testing parsing port lists...\n");
> > if (test_parse_portlist_valid() < 0)
> > return -1;
> > if (test_parse_portlist_invalid_data() < 0)
> > return -1;
> > if (test_parse_portlist_invalid_param() < 0)
> > return -1;
> > - printf("Testind parsing numbers...\n");
> > + printf("Testing parsing numbers...\n");
> > if (test_parse_num_valid() < 0)
> > return -1;
> > if (test_parse_num_invalid_data() < 0)
>
> This spelling fix should be its own patch, not related to s390x
