On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 1:36 PM Van Haaren, Harry
<harry.van.haa...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Assume thread T2 is a service lcore that is in the middle of executing
> > a service function. Also, assume thread T1 concurrently calls
> > rte_service_lcore_stop(), which will set the "service_active_on_lcore"
> > state to false. If thread T1 then calls rte_service_may_be_active(),
> > it can return zero even though T2 is still running the service function.
> > If T1 then proceeds to free data being used by T2, a crash can ensue.
> >
> > Move the logic that clears the "service_active_on_lcore" state from the
> > rte_service_lcore_stop() function to the service_runner_func() to
> > ensure that we:
> > - don't let the "service_active_on_lcore" state linger as 1
> > - don't clear the state early
> >
> > Fixes: 6550113be62d ("service: fix lingering active status")
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Erik Gabriel Carrillo <erik.g.carri...@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>
Applied, thanks.
--
David Marchand
