On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:20:40 +0200 David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 9:54 AM Markus Theil <markus.th...@tu-ilmenau.de> > wrote: > > > > From: Michael Pfeiffer <michael.pfeif...@tu-ilmenau.de> > > > > Also expose the pthread id of each lcore, in > > order to allow modification of pthread attributes, > > for example use rte_thread_setname without executing > > pthread_self() on the maybe already running lcore. > > > > The rte_lcore_to_thread_id function is added to API. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Pfeiffer <michael.pfeif...@tu-ilmenau.de> > > We are trying to abstract the use of pthread in DPDK API. > So I don't think this patch is going in the right direction. Agree, exposing this will make Windows support harder and who knows what next OS to come will need.
