Hi.
According to the API documentation, rte_lcore_count() sets out to
"Return the number of execution units (lcores) on the system"
The EAL documentation states that "the term 'lcore' refers to an EAL
thread", and also refers to regular pthreads having called
rte_thread_register() as "registered non-EAL threads".
This might lead the unwary to believe that rte_lcore_count() did not
include registered non-EAL threads (i.e., normal pthreads that called
rte_thread_register()). But it does.
Registered non-EAL threads are excluded in RTE_LCORE_FOREACH() loops, as
expected. However, the FOREACH macro documentation says "Macro to browse
all running lcores.". Should all interpret all this as a registered
non-EAL thread is a non-running lcore? But a lcore is just another name
for an EAL thread (at least that's how I interpret "refers to"), and
that would lead the non-EAL thread to be an EAL thread. Beyond the
obvious contradiction, the non-EAL thread is not a EAL thread, since you
can't launch tasks on it.
Something is not right here.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Mattias
