On 10/9/22 12:10, Chengwen Feng wrote:
This patch support gets port's error handling mode by
rte_eth_dev_info_get() API.
Currently, the defined modes include:
1) NONE: it means no error handling modes are supported by this port.
2) PASSIVE: passive error handling, after the PMD detect that a reset
is required, the PMD reports RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET event, and
application invoke rte_eth_dev_reset() to recover the port.
Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengcheng...@huawei.com>
in fact one more point below
---
app/test-pmd/config.c | 2 ++
drivers/net/e1000/igb_ethdev.c | 2 ++
drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c | 2 ++
drivers/net/iavf/iavf_ethdev.c | 2 ++
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 2 ++
drivers/net/txgbe/txgbe_ethdev_vf.c | 2 ++
lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
7 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
index 841e8efe78..bd7f2ba257 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
@@ -921,6 +921,8 @@ port_infos_display(portid_t port_id)
printf("Switch Rx domain: %u\n",
dev_info.switch_info.rx_domain);
}
+ if (dev_info.err_handle_mode == RTE_ETH_ERROR_HANDLE_MODE_PASSIVE)
+ printf("Device error handling mode: passive\n");
It should be done using switch/case instead of if/elseif.
Also I'd say that none should be handled as well.
}
void
