Hi Stephen,
On 10/6/22 02:01, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 22:35:24 +0200
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com> wrote:
In practice, it would never happen since 'pkt->pkt_len' is
unlikely to be close to UINT32_MAX, but let's just change
'size' to uint64_t to make the compiler happy without
having to add runtime checks.
Would the standard typedef size_t work since that is what sizeof() returns.
I'm not sure it would not create issues on 32 bits architectures build
given size_t is 32bits in this case if I'm not mistaken, as it adds
something to a u32, so it could wrap to 0.
