> > > Primary process could set up queues state correctly when starting
> > > port, while secondary process not. Under multi-process scenario,
> > "stream_init"
> > > function would get wrong queues state for secondary process.
> > >
> > > This commit is to get queues state from ethdev which is located in
> > > shared memory.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 3c4426db54fc ("app/testpmd: do not poll stopped queues")
> > > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peng Zhang <peng1x.zh...@intel.com>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >   v3:
> > >   - Modify the parameter of rx or tx queue state array
> > >   v2:
> > >   - Change the way of getting secondary process queues states
> > > ---
> > >   app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
> > >   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index
> > > addcbcac85..977ec4fa28 100644
> > > --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > > +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > > @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@
> > >
> > >   #include "testpmd.h"
> > >
> > > +#include <ethdev_driver.h>
> > This header file is internal, app shouldn't use it.
> 
> In this case not all PMDs implement 'rte_eth_rx/tx_queue_info_get()' and
> ethdev won't return 'dev->data->rx/tx_queue_state'.
> 
> > > +
> > >   #ifndef MAP_HUGETLB
> > >   /* FreeBSD may not have MAP_HUGETLB (in fact, it probably doesn't) */
> > >   #define HUGE_FLAG (0x40000)
> > > @@ -2402,10 +2404,24 @@ start_packet_forwarding(int with_tx_first)
> > >           if (!pkt_fwd_shared_rxq_check())
> > >                   return;
> > >
> > > - if (stream_init != NULL)
> > > -         for (i = 0; i < cur_fwd_config.nb_fwd_streams; i++)
> > > -                 stream_init(fwd_streams[i]);
> > > + if (stream_init != NULL) {
> > > +         for (i = 0; i < cur_fwd_config.nb_fwd_streams; i++) {
> > > +                 if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
> > > +                         struct fwd_stream *fs = fwd_streams[i];
> > > +                         struct rte_eth_dev_data *dev_rx_data,
> > *dev_tx_data;
> > > +
> > > +                         dev_rx_data = (&rte_eth_devices[fs-
> >rx_port])-
> > >data;
> > > +                         dev_tx_data = (&rte_eth_devices[fs->tx_port])-
> > >data;
> > > +
> > > +                         uint8_t rx_state = dev_rx_data-
> > >rx_queue_state[fs->rx_queue];
> > > +                         ports[fs->rx_port].rxq[fs->rx_queue].state =
> > rx_state;
> > > +                         uint8_t tx_state = dev_tx_data-
> > >tx_queue_state[fs->tx_queue];
> > > +                         ports[fs->tx_port].txq[fs->tx_queue].state =
> > tx_state;
> > > +                 }
> > >
> > > +                 stream_init(fwd_streams[i]);
> > > +         }
> > > + }
> > >
> > Suggest that an API in ethdev layer can be encapsulated to obtain the
> > device Rx/Tx queue state.
> > Both primary and secondary process get or set queue state by this API.
> 
> Suggestion sounds good, maybe better to add a new API in ethdev layer.
> 
> @andrew, what's your opinion about this solution and huisong's suggestion?
> 
> > >           port_fwd_begin = cur_fwd_config.fwd_eng->port_fwd_begin;
> > >           if (port_fwd_begin != NULL) {
> > >                   for (i = 0; i < cur_fwd_config.nb_fwd_ports; i++) {

Hi, @andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru can you please help review this patch? 
Thanks.

Reply via email to