> > > Primary process could set up queues state correctly when starting > > > port, while secondary process not. Under multi-process scenario, > > "stream_init" > > > function would get wrong queues state for secondary process. > > > > > > This commit is to get queues state from ethdev which is located in > > > shared memory. > > > > > > Fixes: 3c4426db54fc ("app/testpmd: do not poll stopped queues") > > > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Zhang <peng1x.zh...@intel.com> > > > > > > --- > > > v3: > > > - Modify the parameter of rx or tx queue state array > > > v2: > > > - Change the way of getting secondary process queues states > > > --- > > > app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++--- > > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index > > > addcbcac85..977ec4fa28 100644 > > > --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c > > > +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c > > > @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ > > > > > > #include "testpmd.h" > > > > > > +#include <ethdev_driver.h> > > This header file is internal, app shouldn't use it. > > In this case not all PMDs implement 'rte_eth_rx/tx_queue_info_get()' and > ethdev won't return 'dev->data->rx/tx_queue_state'. > > > > + > > > #ifndef MAP_HUGETLB > > > /* FreeBSD may not have MAP_HUGETLB (in fact, it probably doesn't) */ > > > #define HUGE_FLAG (0x40000) > > > @@ -2402,10 +2404,24 @@ start_packet_forwarding(int with_tx_first) > > > if (!pkt_fwd_shared_rxq_check()) > > > return; > > > > > > - if (stream_init != NULL) > > > - for (i = 0; i < cur_fwd_config.nb_fwd_streams; i++) > > > - stream_init(fwd_streams[i]); > > > + if (stream_init != NULL) { > > > + for (i = 0; i < cur_fwd_config.nb_fwd_streams; i++) { > > > + if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) { > > > + struct fwd_stream *fs = fwd_streams[i]; > > > + struct rte_eth_dev_data *dev_rx_data, > > *dev_tx_data; > > > + > > > + dev_rx_data = (&rte_eth_devices[fs- > >rx_port])- > > >data; > > > + dev_tx_data = (&rte_eth_devices[fs->tx_port])- > > >data; > > > + > > > + uint8_t rx_state = dev_rx_data- > > >rx_queue_state[fs->rx_queue]; > > > + ports[fs->rx_port].rxq[fs->rx_queue].state = > > rx_state; > > > + uint8_t tx_state = dev_tx_data- > > >tx_queue_state[fs->tx_queue]; > > > + ports[fs->tx_port].txq[fs->tx_queue].state = > > tx_state; > > > + } > > > > > > + stream_init(fwd_streams[i]); > > > + } > > > + } > > > > > Suggest that an API in ethdev layer can be encapsulated to obtain the > > device Rx/Tx queue state. > > Both primary and secondary process get or set queue state by this API. > > Suggestion sounds good, maybe better to add a new API in ethdev layer. > > @andrew, what's your opinion about this solution and huisong's suggestion? > > > > port_fwd_begin = cur_fwd_config.fwd_eng->port_fwd_begin; > > > if (port_fwd_begin != NULL) { > > > for (i = 0; i < cur_fwd_config.nb_fwd_ports; i++) {
Hi, @andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru can you please help review this patch? Thanks.