On 8/20/22 04:31, Hernan Vargas wrote:
Add unlikely checks for NULL operation values.
Same as for patch 20, this is a fix.
Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.var...@intel.com> --- drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c index 70a29f92a1..ea850e2d7f 100644 --- a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c @@ -3148,6 +3148,10 @@ enqueue_enc_one_op_tb(struct acc100_queue *q, struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op, r = op->turbo_enc.tb_params.r;while (mbuf_total_left > 0 && r < c) {+ if (unlikely(input == 0)) { + rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Not enough input segment"); + return -EINVAL; + } seg_total_left = rte_pktmbuf_data_len(input) - in_offset; /* Set up DMA descriptor */ desc = q->ring_addr + ((q->sw_ring_head + total_enqueued_cbs) @@ -4491,6 +4495,8 @@ acc100_enqueue_ldpc_dec_tb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data, } enqueued_cbs += ret; } + if (unlikely(enqueued_cbs == 0)) + return 0; /* Nothing to enqueue */acc100_dma_enqueue(q, enqueued_cbs, &q_data->queue_stats); @@ -5051,6 +5057,8 @@ acc100_dequeue_dec(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,for (i = 0; i < dequeue_num; ++i) { op = (q->ring_addr + ((q->sw_ring_tail + dequeued_cbs) & q->sw_ring_wrap_mask))->req.op_addr; + if (unlikely(op == NULL)) + break; if (op->turbo_dec.code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_TRANSPORT_BLOCK) ret = dequeue_dec_one_op_tb(q, &ops[i], dequeued_cbs, &aq_dequeued); @@ -5096,6 +5104,8 @@ acc100_dequeue_ldpc_dec(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data, for (i = 0; i < dequeue_num; ++i) { op = (q->ring_addr + ((q->sw_ring_tail + dequeued_cbs) & q->sw_ring_wrap_mask))->req.op_addr; + if (unlikely(op == NULL)) + break; if (op->ldpc_dec.code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_TRANSPORT_BLOCK) ret = dequeue_dec_one_op_tb(q, &ops[i], dequeued_cbs, &aq_dequeued);
With commit message ammended: Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com> Thanks, Maxime
