On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 12:54 PM <835703...@qq.com> wrote:
>
> From: Shiqi Liu <835703...@qq.com>
>
> As the possible failure of the rte_zmalloc(), the not_checked and
> checked could be NULL pointer.
> Therefore, it should be better to check it in order to avoid
> the dereference of the NULL pointer.
>
> Fixes: fa8054c8c88 ("examples/eventdev: add thread safe Tx worker pipeline")
> Signed-off-by: Shiqi Liu <835703...@qq.com>
> ---
> examples/eventdev_pipeline/pipeline_worker_tx.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/examples/eventdev_pipeline/pipeline_worker_tx.c
> b/examples/eventdev_pipeline/pipeline_worker_tx.c
> index a82e064c1c..6ea676c516 100644
> --- a/examples/eventdev_pipeline/pipeline_worker_tx.c
> +++ b/examples/eventdev_pipeline/pipeline_worker_tx.c
> @@ -764,7 +764,9 @@ init_adapters(uint16_t nb_ports)
>
> ret = rte_event_dev_info_get(evdev_id, &dev_info);
> adptr_services = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(struct rx_adptr_services),
> 0);
> -
> + if (adptr_services == NULL) {
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
it does not look like you have tried to compile this patch. It is a
void return function.
CI: http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2022-July/294780.html
Also, Please update the subject. Some suggestion to consider.
examples/eventdev: validate memory allocation
> struct rte_event_port_conf adptr_p_conf = {
> .dequeue_depth = cdata.worker_cq_depth,
> .enqueue_depth = 64,
> --
> 2.35.1.windows.2
>
