On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 7:02 PM Rakesh Kudurumalla
<rkuduruma...@marvell.com> wrote:
>
> During model population part number is different
> for 103xx and hence dpdk initialization fails.
> This fix resolves the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Kudurumalla <rkuduruma...@marvell.com>


Updated the git commit as follows and applied to
dpdk-next-net-mrvl/for-next-net. Thanks

    common/cnxk: fix partnumber for CN103xx

    Correct the partnumber value for CN103xx.

    Fixes: dd462f68f04a ("common/cnxk: support CN103XX platform")
    Cc: sta...@dpdk.org

    Signed-off-by: Rakesh Kudurumalla <rkuduruma...@marvell.com>


> ---
>  drivers/common/cnxk/roc_model.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/common/cnxk/roc_model.c b/drivers/common/cnxk/roc_model.c
> index a68baa65ea..c934a10509 100644
> --- a/drivers/common/cnxk/roc_model.c
> +++ b/drivers/common/cnxk/roc_model.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ struct roc_model *roc_model;
>  #define PART_106xx  0xB9
>  #define PART_105xx  0xBA
>  #define PART_105xxN 0xBC
> -#define PART_103xx  0xBE
> +#define PART_103xx  0xBD
>  #define PART_98xx   0xB1
>  #define PART_96xx   0xB2
>  #define PART_95xx   0xB3
> --
> 2.25.1
>

Reply via email to