On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 07:43:14AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > > > > > Composition of the TSC should reflect contributions to the project, but be > > balanced so that no single party has an undue influence. It should also be > > kept to a manageable size(maybe 7?). > > > > The TSC should elect its own chair, who would have the deciding vote in > > the event that the TSC was deadlocked. Once in place, the TSC should > > approve any new members. > > > > Specific details on membership can be discussed and agreed later, if we > > agree on the creation of a TSC. > > > > TSC should be limited to those individuals and companies that have > contributed in a non-trivial way to the DPDK distributed code base. > It should not be a users group, or place for network vendors who take but > never give back. > +1
It should also endavour to only act as a fallback body for any issues commonly handled by the development communtiy (patch acceptance/review, etc) Neil
