Please choose a stable version 22.11 soon, or 21.11. bugs in 22.07 will not be fixed
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022, 11:38 PM Michael Lekar <michae...@radware.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > > > My name is Michaele and I work in Radware Ltd . Currently we use 17.11.3 > version of dpdk in our product. Now we want to evaluate 22.07 version of > dpdk. We want to build statically linkage dpdk-test application and run it > on our device. We use 7.5 version of gcc. By default, dpdk-test uses shared > library, and we don’t find how to configure meson for build these test > application static. We will be very applicate for any help with issue. > > > > > > [ulp-ng]# ldd dpdk-test > > ./dpdk-test: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.16' not > found (required by ./dpdk-test) > > ./dpdk-test: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.17' not > found (required by ./dpdk-test) > > ./dpdk-test: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.27' not > found (required by ./dpdk-test) > > ./dpdk-test: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.25' not > found (required by ./dpdk-test) > > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffff7ffd000) > > libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007ffff7cfd000) > > libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007ffff7af9000) > > libnuma.so.1 => /usr/lib/libnuma.so.1 (0x00007ffff78ed000) > > libpcap.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpcap.so.1 (0x00007ffff76ac000) > > libatomic.so.1 => /usr/lib/libatomic.so.1 (0x00007ffff74a4000) > > libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 > (0x00007ffff7286000) > > libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007ffff6ec9000) > > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000555555554000) > > [ulp-ng]# > > > > Regards, > > Michael > > > > > > > >
