On 7/9/2022 12:49 AM, lon...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
CAUTION: This message has originated from an External Source. Please use proper
judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to
this email.
From: Long Li <lon...@microsoft.com>
With all the TX queues created, MANA can send packets over those queues.
Signed-off-by: Long Li <lon...@microsoft.com>
---
Change log:
v2:
Rename all camel cases.
<...>
+
+ DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "pkt[%d]: buf_addr 0x%p, nb_segs %d, pkt_len %d",
+ pkt_idx, m_pkt->buf_addr, m_pkt->nb_segs,
+ m_pkt->pkt_len);
+
+ /* Create SGL for packet data buffers */
+ for (uint16_t seg_idx = 0; seg_idx < m_pkt->nb_segs; seg_idx++)
{
This is C99 feature and we tend to not use it BUT,
Thomas, David,
In the past there were c89/c90/ansi code in DPDK, but as far as I can
see no more left.
Is there anything that prevents us using C99 features, like variable in
the for loop, I think it is usefull that it reduces the scope and makes
code more readable, etc...
