On 2022-08-10 23:05, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
<snip>


+TO: @Honnappa, we need input from ARM

From: Konstantin Ananyev [mailto:konstantin.anan...@huawei.com]
Sent: Friday, 29 July 2022 21.49

From: Konstantin Ananyev [mailto:konstantin.anan...@huawei.com]
Sent: Friday, 29 July 2022 14.14


Sorry, missed that part.


Another question - who will do 'sfence' after the copying?
Would it be inside memcpy_nt (seems quite costly), or would it
be another API function for that: memcpy_nt_flush() or so?

Outside. Only the developer knows when it is required, so it
wouldn't
make any sense to add the cost inside memcpy_nt().

I don't think we should add a flush function; it would just be
another name for an already existing function. Referring to the
required
operation in the memcpy_nt() function documentation should
suffice.


Ok, but again wouldn't it be arch specific?
AFAIK for x86 it needs to boil down to sfence, for other
architectures
- I don't know.
If you think there already is some generic one (rte_wmb?) that
would
always produce
correct instructions - sure let's use it.


DPDK has generic functions to wrap architecture specific stuff like
memory barriers.

Because they are non-temporal stores, I suspect that rte_mb() is
required before reading the data from the location it was copied to.
Ensuring that STORE operations are ordered (rte_wmb) might not
suffice. However, I'm not a CPU expert, so I will seek advice from
more qualified people in the community on this.

I think for IA sfence is enough, see citation below, for other
architectures - no idea.
What I am trying to say - it needs to be the *same* function on all
archs we support.

Now I get it: rte_wmb() might be appropriate on x86, but if any other
architecture requires something else, we should add a new common function
for flushing, e.g. rte_memcpy_nt_flush().


IA SW optimization manual:
9.4.2 Streaming Store Usage Models
The two primary usage domains for streaming store are coherent
requests and non-coherent requests.
9.4.2.1 Coherent Requests
Coherent requests are normal loads and stores to system memory, which
may also hit cache lines present in another processor in a
multiprocessor environment. With coherent requests, a streaming store
can be used in the same way as a regular store that has been mapped
with a WC memory type (PAT or MTRR). An SFENCE instruction must be
used within a producer-consumer usage model in order to ensure
coherency and visibility of data between processors.
Within a single-processor system, the CPU can also re-read the same
memory location and be assured of coherence (that is, a single,
consistent view of this memory location).
The same is true for a multiprocessor
(MP) system, assuming an accepted MP software producer-consumer
synchronization policy is employed.


With this reference, I am convinced that you are right about the SFENCE. This
puts a checkmark on this item on my TODO list for the patch. Thank you,
Konstantin!

Any ARM CPU experts on the mailing list seeing this, not on vacation?
@Honnappa, I'm looking at you. :-)

Summing up, the question is:

After a bunch of *non-temporal* stores (STNP instruction) on ARM
architecture, does calling rte_wmb() suffice to ensure the data is visible 
across
the system?
Apologies for the late response, the docs did not have enough information. The 
internal dialogue is still going on, but I have some information now. There is 
some information in ArmV8 programmer's guide [1], though it is not complete.
In summary, rte_wmb()/rte_mb() would not suffice, we need new APIs.

 From my perspective, I see several scenarios:
1)      Need for ordering before the memcpy_nt. Here there are several cases:
        a.      LD – LDNP/STNP – DMB NSHLD
        b.      ST – LDNP/STNP – DMB NSH
2)      Need for ordering after the memcpy. Again, we have the similar use 
cases:
        a.      LDNP/STNP – LD – DMB NSH
        b.      LDNP/STNP – ST – DMB NSH

The 'ST - STNP' and 'STNP - ST' do not apply here, but good to add an API for 
completion.

So, may be we could have rte_[r|w]mb_nt() APIs.


Is rte_smp_rmb()/rte_smp_wmb() also not enough on ARM?

[1] 
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0024/a/The-A64-instruction-set/Memory-access-instructions/Non-temporal-load-and-store-pair

Reply via email to