On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 08:59:15 +0300 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlow...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 09/08/2022 14:44, lihuisong (C) wrote: > > > > 在 2022/8/5 23:35, Stephen Hemminger 写道: > >> On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 11:10:22 +0800 > >> Huisong Li <lihuis...@huawei.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Currently, the steps for binding device from dpdk driver to kernel > >>> driver is as follows: > >>> echo $BDF > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/vfio-pci/unbind > >>> echo $BDF > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/$kernel_driver/bind > >>> > >>> This steps cannot bind device from dpdk driver to kernel driver on > >>> platform with kernel 5.19. The 'driver_override' must be specify > >>> kernel driver before binding device to kernel driver. > >>> > >>> Fixes: 720b7a058260 ("usertools: fix device binding with kernel tools") > >>> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuis...@huawei.com> > >> Not sure exactly what you did and why. > >> The patch seems to just remove the check that the driver > >> is in the set of dpdk_drivers. > >> . > > Currently, the end of the operation binding device from kernel driver to > > dpdk driver write '\00' to driver_override file so as to this device can > > be bound to any other driver. > > This could have work but this was not the way to use the > driver_override. The kernel ABI document clearly states: > "and may be cleared with an empty string (echo > driver_override)." > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci > > Please use the kernel ABI how it is described. Using it in wrong way > might sometimes work, sometimes not. No, the kernel ABI is what ever worked before. The documentation is not the definitive standard.