> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2022 5:57 PM
> To: Ding, Xuan <xuan.d...@intel.com>; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo....@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ling, WeiX <weix.l...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/vhost: fix compliant offloading flag
>
>
>
> On 6/28/22 11:42, xuan.d...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Xuan Ding <xuan.d...@intel.com>
> >
> > This patch fixes the check to set compliant offloading flag.
> > Compliant offloading flag should be set when the 'legacy-ol-flags' is
> > true.
> >
> > Fixes: 3a6ee8dafb21("net/vhost: enable compliant offloading mode")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xuan Ding <xuan.d...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> > b/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> > index d75d256040..24049df58a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> > @@ -1735,7 +1735,7 @@ rte_pmd_vhost_probe(struct rte_vdev_device
> *dev)
> > goto out_free;
> > }
> >
> > - if (legacy_ol_flags == 0)
> > + if (legacy_ol_flags == 1)
> > flags |= RTE_VHOST_USER_NET_COMPLIANT_OL_FLAGS;
> >
> > if (dev->device.numa_node == SOCKET_ID_ANY)
>
> Nack, legacy OL flags is NOT compliant. So current implementation is good.
Sorry, it's a wrong fix, the compliant mode is enabled by default.
Regards,
Xuan
>
> Regards,
> Maxime
