2022-06-21 11:51 (UTC-0700), Tyler Retzlaff:
> > > +int
> > > +rte_thread_join(rte_thread_t thread_id, unsigned long *value_ptr)
> > > +{
> > > + int ret = 0;
> > > + void *res = NULL;
> > > + void **pres = NULL;
> > > +
> > > + if (value_ptr != NULL)
> > > +         pres = &res;
> > > +
> > > + ret = pthread_join((pthread_t)thread_id.opaque_id, pres);
> > > + if (ret != 0) {
> > > +         RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "pthread_join failed\n");
> > > +         return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (value_ptr != NULL && *pres != NULL)
> > > +         *value_ptr = *(unsigned long *)(*pres);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}  
> > 
> > What makes *pres == NULL special?  
> 
> it's not clear what you mean, can you explain? maybe there is some
> context i am missing from the original patch series?

There's no previous context.
After ptread_join(), *pres holds the return value of the thread routine.
You only assign *value_ptr if value_ptr is not NULL (obviously correct)
and if *pres != NULL, that is, if the thread returned a non-NULL value.
But this value is opaque, why do you filter NULL?
Perhaps you meant if (pres != NULL), no dereference?

> > > +int
> > > +rte_thread_create(rte_thread_t *thread_id,
> > > +           const rte_thread_attr_t *thread_attr,
> > > +           rte_thread_func thread_func, void *args)
> > > +{
> > > + int ret = 0;
> > > + DWORD tid;
> > > + HANDLE thread_handle = NULL;
> > > + GROUP_AFFINITY thread_affinity;
> > > + struct thread_routine_ctx *ctx = NULL;
> > > +
> > > + ctx = calloc(1, sizeof(*ctx));
> > > + if (ctx == NULL) {
> > > +         RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "Insufficient memory for thread context 
> > > allocations\n");
> > > +         ret = ENOMEM;
> > > +         goto cleanup;
> > > + }
> > > + ctx->routine_args = args;
> > > + ctx->thread_func = thread_func;
> > > +
> > > + thread_handle = CreateThread(NULL, 0, thread_func_wrapper, ctx,
> > > +         CREATE_SUSPENDED, &tid);
> > > + if (thread_handle == NULL) {
> > > +         ret = thread_log_last_error("CreateThread()");
> > > +         free(ctx);
> > > +         goto cleanup;  
> > 
> > Missing `free(ctx)` from other error paths below.  
> 
> beyond this point free(ctx) will happen in thread_func_wrapper. i will
> add a comment to make it clear.

Not if you exit before ResumeThread()
and thread_func_wrapper() will never execute to call free().

Reply via email to